Comparing EOR vs. Setting Up a Local Entity: Which is Right for Your Business?

Expanding into international markets is a strategic move for businesses looking to access new opportunities and talent. However, choosing the right approach to establish a presence in a foreign country can be challenging. Companies often decide between working with an Employer of Record (EOR) or setting up a local entity—each option comes with advantages and limitations.

In this blog, we’ll explore the key differences between an EOR and a local entity, helping you make an informed decision for your business expansion.

What is an Employer of Record (EOR)?

An Employer of Record (EOR) is a third-party organization that legally employs workers on behalf of a company in a foreign country. While the business manages day-to-day operations and assigns tasks, the EOR handles employment contracts, payroll, compliance, and tax obligations.

Key Benefits of Using an EOR

  • Quick market entry without needing entity registration
  • Compliance with local labor laws without legal risks
  • Cost-effective expansion with minimal administrative burden
  • Payroll, benefits, and HR administration managed seamlessly
  • Flexibility to hire remote talent in different regions

What is a Local Entity?

A local entity is a legally registered business structure in a foreign country, such as a subsidiary, branch, or representative office. This setup provides full control over operations but requires compliance with local regulations, tax laws, and HR responsibilities.

Key Benefits of Setting Up a Local Entity

  • Full operational control over business decisions
  • Direct employer-employee relationships under local law
  • Stronger presence and credibility in the local market
  • Long-term scalability for business growth

Comparing EOR vs. Local Entity: Key Differences

Feature
Employer of Record (EOR)
Local Entity
Setup Time
Fast (weeks)
Lengthy (months)
Legal Compliance
Managed by EOR
Requires local legal expertise
Payroll & Tax Administration
Handled by EOR
Must be managed in-house
Costs
Lower upfront costs
High setup & operational costs
Flexibility
Ideal for short-term or remote teams
Best for long-term presence
Risk & Liability
Reduced employer liability
Full legal responsibility
Market Presence
Limited brand presence
Strong local credibility

Which Option is Right for Your Business?

Choose an EOR if:

Set Up a Local Entity if:

How EOR Services Benefit Businesses Expanding to India

India has emerged as a prime destination for global businesses, offering a vast talent pool and cost-effective workforce. However, setting up a local entity in India requires navigating complex labor laws, tax regulations, and compliance requirements.

By partnering with an EOR in India, businesses can:

  • Hire local talent without entity registration
  • Ensure compliance with India’s employment laws
  • Manage payroll, benefits, and taxation seamlessly
  • Expand operations flexibly without long-term commitments

Conclusion

Both Employer of Record (EOR) and setting up a local entity offer unique advantages, and the right choice depends on your business goals. If you need fast and compliant hiring with minimal administrative burden, an EOR is the ideal solution. However, for businesses seeking long-term market presence and full operational control, establishing a local entity might be more beneficial.

By carefully assessing your expansion strategy, costs, and compliance needs, you can determine the best approach to successfully grow your business in new markets.

2025-26 © Aurigome Private Limited. Copyright All Rights Reserved

Scroll to Top